http://www.clarin.com/diario/2009/04/24/espectaculos/c -00702.htm
DANCE: INTERVIEW WITH LUIS Biasotto
entertain Banning
presents a play, "October", in which questions about the parameters and contemporary dance.
What
understand how reflection in relation to "October"?
At first, I wanted to depart from my usual sense of a show: do not think a show just for fun, I say this as self-criticism because my spectacles tend to entertain.
I think it was purely commercial entertainment, dance, theater, music contemporary film or do not seek only "entertainment."
I mean the viewer in almost any show is passive, so I thought from what point of view could generate something more reflective, and interested me express what I see happening in dance: what happens when a being created. And there are other points: I did a reading of Heiner Muller in which he speaks of the death of actor, and also Roland Barthes, when dealing with the disappearance of the author. Before, I was in a very French alternative festival and the work I saw there can not be categorized as dance, what happens then when one thinks of a spectacle "Contemporary", and I say in quotes, "contemporary art". Pay the entrance but do not know what you'll see.
Is not a concept at this point, quite outdated?
I tell you what I think, you draw your conclusions. I mean, when you go to the theater pay to see something you probably already know her, in October , no. I dealt with that was not contained in previous newsletters who was going to work or how many people participate.
Why did you call for dancers for a work in which there is no dance?
Because they are the only people who understand me and because they a thoroughness that the actors, at least the ones I know-nots.
Despite this profound reflection of the speaker, the tone of your work is funny.
I do not know, I get well. Is it because I'm from Cordoba.
0 comments:
Post a Comment